Capstone Projects Capstone Projects are intended to be intensive, active learning projects, requiring significant effort in the planning and implementation, as well as preparation of a substantial final written work product. For approval of a Capstone Project, interested students must submit a written proposal to Professor Kathryn Bradley detailing:
Grading Capstone projects are graded blind, using a standard rubric in which points are assigned or deducted based on specific criteria.
The grading rubric is made available to students during the semester, and is generally available on the Capstone Project Website at http: While use of the rubric is intended to promote consistency in grading, there will be variations in grading decisions by the faculty members grading the submissions.
These variations are appropriate in the review of a complex policy analysis, and are consistent with the variations in decision-maker support that a policy analysis would achieve in a real-world project.
The following grading rules and processes apply: A conventional IN grade can be assigned by the faculty member. The rules for satisfying an IN are explained in a subsequent section of this policy.
Capstone projects are to be graded by MPA faculty members who are not teaching the section in which the student is enrolled. Generally, the faculty members who grade projects are teaching the other capstone sections during the semester involved, or have taught the capstone course at least once.
The projects are graded on a point scale, where the primary memorandum can receive up to 60 points and the other two components each receive up to 20 points.
A total of 60 points is necessary to pass the overall project.
If the second-reader faculty member assigns 60 points or more, then the student passes. If the second-reader faculty member does not assign 60 points or more, the student will be informed by the faculty member teaching the students course section, who will also share both sets of grading sheets with the student.
The student then has the opportunity to make revisions to the project and resubmit the project for a second-round grading. The second-stage grading works like the first one. A second-round first-reader faculty member grades the project, and it if does not pass a second-round second-reader faculty member grades the project.
In summary, for a student to fail at this stage of the course, there will have been two project submissions and four separate unsatisfactory gradings of the project. However, the faculty member must determine that the student has consistently attended class in accordance with the attendance expectations set out in the course syllabus for the section, and that even though the second-round submission failed, that the student made material revisions intended to be responsive to the comments on the first submission.
Students are not automatically entitled to the additional review options. In particular, a student with a very high GPA may not bypass participation in the course and bypass submission of the project, intending to pass the requirement based on the portfolio review process.
The opportunity for portfolio review must be earned through effort and attendance. A designated faculty member who administers the portfolio review process calculates an alternate score for the student based on the following rules: The highest score achieved based on the following: The highest of the first-round and second-round gradings for this section of the project, or, up to 3.
For example, a student with a 3. Executive summary and presentation: The highest scores achieved based on the following: Portfolio Review Passing Score: The minimum passing score on portfolio review is 55 points.The outline structure is approximately the same whether you write a research outline on dreams or some topic distant from this one, like a research outline for PhD application.
The structure is identical to the structure of the research paper itself. The capstone outline is a layout that gives a proper idea of writing this project.
First of all, this outline is important to consider for knowing about real structure and method of preparing this paper.5/5.
Outline for Rhetorical Analysis. A rhetorical analysis essay follows the framework of a conventional composition. This means it should have an introduction, thesis, body paragraphs, and a conclusion.
It also has a summary of the argument and strengths and weaknesses of the discussions.
The Capstone Seminar is designed to demonstrate your accumulated training in International Studies in a single original project of your choice, subject to the instructor’s approval and under theadditional supervision of a faculty mentor.
Examples of MLS Programs and Capstone Essays since Essays whose titles are in blue can be read online by clicking on them Anthony (Buddy) Candela. The capstone project proposal should demonstrate evidence of scholarly review and critique of the literature and a detailed and well thought out project plan.